Spiritual Abuse and Complex PTSD: Understanding the Symptoms

Spiritual Abuse

Apr 4

The psychological and emotional impacts of spiritual abuse vary considerably from person to person, shaped by factors such as the nature and duration of the experience, the life stage at which it occurred, how the individual made sense of what happened, and other influences on the way they process and respond to it. For some, spiritual abuse results in some temporary symptoms of acute stress or trauma. Others may meet the criteria for Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) or Complex PTSD.

A Vignette - The story of Simeon note that Simeon is a fictional person):

Simeon had been part of a church community for nearly a decade before the new pastor arrived. Those early years had been genuinely good: a warm, established congregation where he had found real belonging. He had served faithfully, built close friendships, become someone people relied on. It was the kind of church he had hoped to grow old in.

The new pastor came with energy and vision. Charismatic, theologically sharp, full of conviction about where God was leading the church. In the beginning, most people were excited. The pastor seemed to notice him early, affirming his gifts, drawing him into leadership conversations, making him feel seen, appreciated and nurtured. He felt, at first, that he could trust the pastor and he had his best interests in mind.

It was difficult to pinpoint when things changed, because they changed slowly. First, new expectations were introduced about attendance, accountability, and the kind of loyalty that was expected and explained in spiritual language. Members were encouraged to share personal struggles in small groups and with the pastor individually, and those disclosures began to be referenced in ways that felt less like pastoral care and more like leverage, or to undermine trust in people the pastor was not seeing eye to eye with. Friendships and spending time with family outside the church were subtly discouraged. Decisions about jobs, relationships, finances or struggles with sin were increasingly framed as matters requiring the pastor's spiritual input. Simeon had always aspired to honour God and his spiritual leaders, so he became increasingly transparent and open with the pastor. To resist this felt like he might be resisting God.

However, gradually he began to notice things that troubled him: the way any kind of questioning of the pastor was handled, the pattern of people leaving quietly and then being spoken about in hushed, damning terms, the growing sense that if he exerted any independence or gently questionned something, he would experience the silent treatment, or dysreguation from the pastor, or he would come away from the conversation more confused than before. One time he was told he had a problem with authority, and another time that his doubts were spiritually dangerous, and that the enemy was using his independent thinking against him. Over time, he started to feel like the problem must be with him. He told himself that faithful people accepted correction and were humble.

The turning point came during a leadership meeting: ten other people were around a table, elders and senior volunteers, people he had known and trusted for years. He had raised a concern about some new practices that were being introduced that he did not understand and thought could be harmful to others. He had chosen his words carefully, and he was careful not to blame or accuse anyone.

The pastor let him finish. Then, in front of everyone, he stood up and told Simeon that a spirit of rebellion had been growing in him for some time, and that this moment was evidence of it. That his concern for this family was not compassion but pride, a need to position himself as the leader, and undermine God’s annointed. He said that God had recently shown him, the pastor, things about his character that he himself could not yet see, and that the fact he couldn't see them was precisely the problem. He was told that his persistent questioning was a sign of unresolved sin, that a man genuinely surrendered to God would not keep finding reasons to challenge his appointed leadership. He looked around the table. initially no one spoke. A couple of people were looking at their hands. Eventually another leader, who was known to be close to the pastor stated that he agreed with what the pastor was saying, and felt Simeon was full of pride.

The pastor then placed a hand on his shoulder and prayed over him, loudly, warmly, with great apparent tenderness, asking God to soften his heart, to free him from the pride and bitterness that were keeping him from the fullness of what God had for him. Simeon sat very still while it happened. When it was over, people began gathering their things as if nothing unusual had occurred.

He drove home and sat in the car outside his house for a long time. He felt humiliated and taken apart in front of people who had said nothing, or who had backed the pastor. But underneath that was something more destabilising: the familiar, nauseating uncertainty about whether the pastor was right. Whether this really was pride. Whether he had, somehow, misread everything again.

Over the following few years, several similar incidents occurred. He became more afraid to speak, yet as more alarming changes were introduced he grew increasingly unsettled — at times finding it almost impossible not to ask questions. When he did, the same pattern would emerge: condemnation, dressed in spiritual language.

One day he spoke to some people from the church about his concerns, a few days later the pastor asked to talk to him after church with three other leaders. Together they told him they believed he was being led astray by spiritual forces, and he was leading others astray through gossip and disention. They said he was lukewarm and backslidden. The following Sunday he drove to the car park and walked toward the building, but couldn't make himself go through the door.

He asked to meet with the pastor. In one last effort, he tried to express the confusion he was carrying and his concern that the pastoral approach was causing harm — to himself and to others. The pastor was harsh, at one point standing over him, and insisted that the problem lay with Simeon: his pride, his lack of humility, his inability to hear God's voice. Simeon did not go back after that meeting. It no longer felt safe.

Within a fortnight he learned that the pastor had already been speaking to others. The account that circulated was that Simeon had left in bitterness after being lovingly corrected. The friendships he had built over years were simply gone — he heard from none of them. He passed a couple of them at the school drop-off and they looked away. He felt humiliated, misunderstood, and profoundly alone.

In the months, he couldn't drive past the church without his chest tightening. A worship song, a familiar phrase, seeing someone from the church, could flood him suddenly with feelings of guilt, sadness, and overwhlem. He tried to pray and found he couldn't. Something in him went blank and far away the moment he tried to engage in any spiritual practices. His sleep was broken, and he had frequent nightmares that tended to include elements of being trapped, watched, condemned, and unable to find an exit.

He took a different route to work to avoid the church. He would scan the supermarket car park before going in, wondering if he would see someone from church. He stopped going to his gym, as a few people from church frequented there.

What made it hardest was the shame — not just about what had happened, but about his own response to it. He could not trust his own perceptions. He would replay conversations, trying to work out where he had gone wrong, where he had misread something or overreacted or made more of it than it was. He was never quite sure he hadn't.

The confidence he had once had in his own judgement had been worn down over time. What replaced it was a persistent uncertainty about what he actually thought or felt, separate from what he had been told to think and feel. Even at a distance from it, he wasn't sure where his own voice ended and the pastor's began.

That was the most disorienting part. The pastor's voice was still there, telling him that whatever he was feeling was evidence of something broken in him, something that had been there long before any of this started. Part of him still believed the pastor’s verdict about him.

His wife said he seemed like a different person. He knew she was right. What he couldn't yet find the words for was how much he wanted to find his way back to the version of himself that had once entered a church and felt, without complication, that he belonged.

Note: The above is drawn from themes common among spiritual abuse survivors. It does not describe any individual person.

What this story illustrates is not a dramatic crisis but a gradual erosion: of agency, of perception, of the ordinary capacity to trust one's own judgement. In his story are elements of coercive control. Yet spiritual abuse can be so confusing and destablising in part because it doesn’t look, from the outside, like trauma. There was no single catastrophic event. But the impact on his nervous system, his sense of self, and his relationship with faith was real and significant.

The framework of Complex PTSD (C-PTSD), from the ICD-11 describes what can happen when trauma is not a single incident but a prolonged experience of harm within a relationship or context that was difficult or impossible to leave. Not everyone who has experienced spiritual abuse will develop C-PTSD, and responses exist on a spectrum shaped by many factors. But for those whose impact has been deep and wide-ranging, this framework can offer a coherent explanation for experiences they have. Others may recognise some, but not all of these symptoms.

What is Complex Post Traumatic Stress Syndrome

Six areas that can be affected

The research on complex trauma identifies six areas of a person's life that prolonged harm can touch.

1. Distressing memories and flashbacks

2. Avoidance of reminders and triggers

3. A persistent sense of being unsafe

4. Difficulty managing emotions

5. A damaged or uncertain sense of self

6. Struggles with trust and relationships

This article will explore how each of these may manifest in those that have experienced religious trauma or spiritual abuse.

Re-experiencing: when the past keeps showing up in the present

Re-experiencing may be experienced as flashbacks. However, more often it is subtler: a sudden wave of feeling overwhelmed when exposed to a trigger or memory, an image that surfaces uninvited, a physical sensation without obvious cause. Not everyone who has experienced spiritual abuse will have significant re-experiencing symptoms, but for those who do, they can be particularly disorienting when the triggers are woven into the fabric of everyday faith life.

Intrusive memories - These can occur with or without specific triggers. A sudden memory of something that happened emerges.
Emotional flashbacks - A sudden flood of an emotional state, such as deep shame, fear, or a feeling of being very small or unsafe, that seems out of proportion to what is happening right now. There may be no clear memory attached, just the feeling arriving without warning.
Nightmares- Sometimes these may be a direct replay of events, but emotionally equivalent scenarios: being condemned, exposed, trapped, unable to find the exit may occur in dreams.
Dissociation during faith practices - Spacing out, going numb, or losing the thread of the present moment when praying, reading scripture or attending worship. When those practices became associated with harm, with surveillance, strong feelings of shame and the loss of your own voice, the nervous system learns to protect you from them even when the current context is safe.

Avoidance

When certain things trigger painful re-experiencing, a common response is to avoid them. For some, distancing from faith and religion is a choice, but for many who experiece spiritual abuse and trauma their faith still remains important to them. Deep down, they desire to be able to engage with faith practices and find a church community, but this feels very difficult as avoidance feels safer.

Avoiding church, worship or religious gatherings - Not because faith no longer matters, but because the nervous system has learned to associate those spaces with danger and the loss of self. For some this lifts relatively quickly; for others it persists much longer, especially where the community was large or its reach wide.
Difficulty engaging with scripture or prayer - Practices that were once a source of life may now feel impossible to approach without distress or numbness. When these practices were used as tools of control, as measures of compliance and sources of shame, they carry that freight long afterwards.
Avoidance spreading beyond the original context - Sometimes avoidance generalises from the specific community, to the broader tradition, to faith in general. This is more common when the harmful environment was the person's primary spiritual frame of reference.
Avoiding your own internal processing - Staying busy, not wanting to think about it, shutting down when the subject arises. The mind protecting itself from material it doesn't yet feel safe enough to hold.

A persistent sense of threat: when your body doesn't know it's over

One of trauma's hallmarks is that the nervous system continues to act as if the danger is still present, even after the external situation has changed. In coercive control environments, where threat was relational and ambient rather than discrete, this can be particularly difficult to resolve because there was rarely a single clear moment when it ended. This may presnent in the following ways:

Hypervigilance in everyday contexts - This may involve scanning a new church for signs of control, responding sensitively to any sign of percieved disapproval, checking the supermarket car park before going in, and rehearsing what to say if someone does ask you why you left. The nervous system is constantly scanning for potential threat and quietly shrinking the radius of what feels safe.
Physical responses to spiritual triggers - A person may notice that their heart rate climbs, muscles tighten, and breathing becomes shallow, or they feel intense feelings of rage or emotion in response to a style of preaching, a church building, or particular biblical language or analogy that was used as a mechanism of control. The body holds what the mind is still working to process, and sometimes these physiological symptoms lead to reactions that further signal to the body that they are not safe.
Ongoing fear of spiritual consequences- After leaving, many survivors continue to experience a residual fear of condemnation or divine punishment. Alongside this, the damaging messages delivered by abusive leaders are often internalised — absorbed so thoroughly that they begin to operate as the person's own thoughts rather than as something imposed from outside.
This is referred to in therapy as the inner critic: an internalised voice that repeats harsh, shaming, or condemning messages, often in the tone and language of the original source. In the context of spiritual abuse, the inner critic frequently carries the specific content of what was taught or spoken, including warnings about being spiritually deficient, prideful, or deceived. Because this voice feels internal rather than external, survivors often experience it as truth about themselves rather than as the residue of someone else's agenda. This makes it particularly difficult to challenge.
The tendency to replay these messages, especially at times where they feel vulnerable or triggered, can lock survivors into cycles of shame, self-doubt, and spiritual fear long after the abusive environment has been left behind, and long after the rational mind has recognised that what occurred was harmful.
A background hum of unease - a persistent sense of threat can lead to aninability to fully rest, a low-level sense that something is about to go wrong, a sense of watchfulness and hypervigilance that makes is hard to switch off. For those who spent years in an environment where the ground could shift without warning, or sudden negative consequences occured intermittently, this can be one of the most exhausting legacies of religious trauma.

Disturbances in Self-Organisation

The three symptom clusters above are the core features of standard PTSD as defined by the ICD-11. What follows describes the additional features that distinguish Complex PTSD — the features the ICD-11 uses to capture what happens when trauma is prolonged, relational, or involves coercive control over time.

Not everyone who has experienced spiritual abuse will relate to these. But for those who experienced sustained abuse within a religious system — whether psychological, emotional, physical, or sexual — these clusters may describe something they recognise. For those who came out the other side of spiritual abuse feeling like they no longer knew who they were, or like the person they used to be had been gradually replaced by someone smaller and less certain, this section may help explain why.

It is not uncommon for a survivor of complex PTSD to say "I kept waiting to feel like myself again. But I wasn't sure anymore who that was, or whether that person had ever really been allowed to exist."

Affect dysregulation: when emotions become hard to manage

Sustained trauma disrupts the nervous system's ability to modulate emotional experience. This is compounded in spiritual abuse by environments that actively taught that certain emotions were spiritually dangerous. Doubt can be reframed as faithlessness, anger as sin, grief as a failure of trust. Emotions that are consistently unsafe to feel don't resolve. They accumulate, and they tend to resurface, often much later, in a range of ways:

Emotional flooding - Waves of shame, grief or anger can suddenly present in ways that feel sudden and disproportionate. These can appear to be overreactions, but are the resurfacing of emotional material that had no safe outlet during the years of harm.
Emotional numbness or flatness - A muted, disconnected emotional life, going through the motions, difficulty feeling much at all. Some people oscillate between flooding and numbness; others settle predominantly in one. Both are the nervous system attempting to manage what has been, for a long time, unmanageable.
Grief without a clear object - Those with complex trauma often describe a diffuse, sometimes inexplicable sadness.

Negative self-concept: carrying a self that was shaped by harm

Coercive control in spiritual contexts works in part by replacing a person's internal authority with an external one. Independent thinking is reframed as pride or rebellion; personal perception is consistently overridden; the leader's interpretation of events becomes, over time, more real than the person's own experience. The self that emerges from years of this has been significantly shaped by the demands and distortions of the system. This leads to a fragmented, confused, unstable sense of self that can manifest in the following ways:

Deep, internalised shame about who you are - Shame is a pervasive, low-level sense of being fundamentally defective, not quite right, always potentially one step away from exposure or rejection. In coercive environments, this shame was often the primary mechanism of control, deliberately cultivated and consistently reinforced. Even after leaving a spiritually abusive environment, pervasive feelings of shame are common in survivors.
Difficulty trusting your own perceptions - Chronic self-doubt, a reflexive assumption that you have misread the situation, a tendency to defer to others' interpretations of your own experience. This is a direct and predictable consequence of environments that systematically worked to undermine confidence in your own mind.
This pattern is sometimes described as an inner gaslighter — an internalised version of the confusion that was created from outside. Unlike the inner critic, which is harsh and condemning, the inner gaslighter is uncertain and circular: maybe I am the problem, maybe I did overreact, maybe I misread it, maybe I'm remembering it wrong. It doesn't attack so much as destabilise — keeping the person in a state of perpetual self-questioning rather than ever landing on a clear sense of what actually happened or what they actually feel.
For survivors of spiritual abuse, this is reinforced by having been repeatedly told that their perceptions were wrong, their motives were suspect, or their emotional responses were spiritually immature. The questioning becomes automatic. Even at a distance from the environment, the person finds themselves relitigating their own experience, never quite able to trust their own account of it.
An inner critic that sounds like the system or spiritually abusive leader - The harshest internal voice (punitive critic) many survivors carry closely echoes the language, framing and specific condemnations of the abusive environment, often still delivered in spiritual terms, as the voice of God or conscience. It is an internalised imprint of the harm. Oakley (2009) found victims of religious trauma indicated that spiritual abuse flet like an attack on their core self, and indicated they felt blame, distrust and fear.
Shame about your own symptoms - Perhaps one of the most painful aspects of recovering from spiritual abuse is the tendency to interpret trauma responses as personal or spiritual failure. This is made harder by the fact that symptoms don't arrive consistently — they come in waves, often triggered by something specific, and can surface even when things have been going well for a period of time.
This means that someone can be making genuine progress — rebuilding trust, re-engaging with community, feeling more settled — and then something happens that brings the shame, self-doubt, and instability rushing back. Rather than recognising this as a normal feature of trauma recovery, it gets interpreted as evidence that they are fundamentally broken, that the progress wasn't real, or that full recovery isn't possible for them.
For those with a faith background, this layer is often particularly painful. Struggling to feel stable, connected, or trusting can feel like a failure of faith rather than a predictable response to what they experienced. The symptoms themselves become another source of shame — which compounds the original wound rather than allowing it to heal.

Relational disturbance: when connection itself becomes complicated

Environments of coercive control reshape the relational template. When belonging was conditional, when dependence on community was used as leverage, and when the cost of leaving was the loss of your entire social and spiritual world, these experiences leave marks on how relationships feel from that point forward. Trust, authority, closeness and group belonging all carry a different meaning, and can be complicated and anxiety- provoking.

Difficulty trusting authority or institutional belonging - Experiences of spiritual abuse and religious trauma often lead to a wariness, cynicism, or lack of trust in those with authority and in institutions. New churches, or workplaces with strong leadership cultures or where belonging feels contingent on compliance can feel familiar, and therefore unsafe.
Pushing and pulling in close relationships - Spiritual abuse can lead distrupt attachment patterning in relationships that feel similar to the spiritually abusive ones. Religious trauma survivors can find themselves longing for connection and seeking the approval and support of faith leaders, but then they will also feel a strong desire to pull bacak and withdraw when they receive this support.
Compulsive compliance or people-pleasing - Spiritual abuse can lead to a difficulty saying no, an automatic orientation toward what others need or expect, and a deep discomfort with disapproval. These patterns were adaptive in an environment where non-compliance carried real spiritual and social cost. However these tendencies can lead to burnout, resentment, and superficial relationships that do not meet deeper relational needs. They also make someone susceptible to future experiences of spiritual abuse.
A disrupted relationship with God- When God's voice and the leader's voice became difficult to distinguish, when faith itself became a site of control rather than freedom, the relationship with God can carry the same complicated weight as any other authority. The longing to reconnect with God is often still very much present, but the pathway back to this can feel confusing and at times threatening. This concept is explored in research as attachment to God (click here for an article about attachment to God)

On Feeling Like a Different Person

Simeon in the story at the beginning of this article didn't lose himself all at once. It happened gradually, across four years of accumulating confusion, small concessions, repeated reframings of his own experience, a slow transfer of authority from his own judgement to someone else's. By the time he left, the version of himself that had walked in felt very far away.

If any part of that resonates, it may be helpful to understand that this type of response to spiritual abuse is more common in those who are committed, trusting and take their faith seriously. Therefore, it is not a reflection of your dedication or faith. Often your dedication to service, love for God, and humility that make a high-control religious leader or system’s mechanisms effective.

Recovery from this kind of harm is not a matter of deciding to trust yourself again, or returning to faith as though nothing happened. It is a gradual process, and it moves on multiple fronts.

It involves learning to recognise your own voice again — to distinguish your own thoughts and feelings from the ones that were put there. It means developing the ability to notice when something is genuinely unsafe, without the alarm system firing at everything. It means becoming more comfortable with ambiguity, rather than needing certainty to feel okay.

It involves learning that shame is not evidence. That the wave of self-doubt that arrives after a hard moment does not mean the progress wasn't real, or that something is fundamentally wrong with you.

It means gradually rebuilding a stable sense of who you are — not the version that was shaped by the environment, but something that feels more genuinely yours. Learning to manage difficult emotions without being overwhelmed by them, or pushing them away entirely. Beginning to relate to others with some degree of trust again, without either collapsing into dependence or keeping everyone at arm's length.

And for those for whom faith remains important, it means finding a way back to that — slowly, carefully, on your own terms — without the distorting lens of what you were told God thought of you.

For many people, that process leads somewhere unexpected: not back to who they were before, but forward into a faith and a self that are more genuinely their own, because they have arrived through a much harder road.

If you recognise yourself here

Recovery is rarely linear, and it looks different for everyone. But it is worth noting that for some survivors, the other side of this experience has brought unexpected growth. Crocker (2021) found that some participants reported meaningful identity-related changes following spiritual abuse — including taking greater personal ownership of their faith, developing increased empathy and open-mindedness, forming deeper and more authentic connections with others, and a stronger sense of their own identity. For some, a renewed or more personally grounded relationship with God also emerged over time.

These kinds of outcomes may be understood through the lens of posttraumatic growth — the phenomenon in which people report increased functioning and positive change following a traumatic experience (Tedeschi & Calhoun, 2004). This is not to minimise what was lost, or to suggest that harm leads inevitably to growth. It is simply to say that people do recover, and that recovery can open doors that weren't there before.

If you recognise yourself in any part of this article, you don't have to navigate it alone. Support is available — whether through a psychologist, counsellor, or therapist who understands trauma and is sensitive to the role that faith plays in people's lives. You deserve care that takes the full weight of what you experienced seriously, and that walks alongside you at a pace that feels safe. Some links below will guide you to more information:

Learn more about support for spiritual abuse

Request a session with psychologist kylie walls